<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel rdf:about="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/137">
<title>Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies</title>
<link>http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/137</link>
<description>  </description>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14776"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14775"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14769"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14768"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14766"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14765"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14761"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14760"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2013-05-20T07:31:29Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14776">
<title>N400 The Gun Debate I Lost</title>
<link>http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14776</link>
<description>N400 The Gun Debate I Lost
Etzioni, Amitai
</description>
<dc:date>2013-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14775">
<title>N399 The Reasonable Interrogation of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev</title>
<link>http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14775</link>
<description>N399 The Reasonable Interrogation of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
Etzioni, Amitai
</description>
<dc:date>2013-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14769">
<title>North Korea and US Priorities - Chinese Translation</title>
<link>http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14769</link>
<description>North Korea and US Priorities - Chinese Translation
Amitai, Etzioni
</description>
<dc:date>2013-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14768">
<title>N398 Time for New Paradigms</title>
<link>http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14768</link>
<description>N398 Time for New Paradigms
Etzioni, Amitai
</description>
<dc:date>2013-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14766">
<title>N397 Israel -- 65 Years Ago</title>
<link>http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14766</link>
<description>N397 Israel -- 65 Years Ago
Amitai, Etzioni
Sixty-five years ago it was far from obvious that Israel would survive; it was even far from obvious that a Jewish state would be created in the first place.&#13;
&#13;
In 1947, the General Assembly of the United Nations voted for a resolution calling for the division of British-controlled Palestine into two states -- one of which would be a Jewish state and one of which would be predominantly Palestinian. Specifically, Palestine would be divided into seven sections, three Jewish and four Arab, with Jerusalem placed under international administration. Jewish representatives accepted the deal; however, both the Arab League as well as the Palestinian organizations rejected the plan.
</description>
<dc:date>2013-04-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14765">
<title>N396 North Korea and U.S. Priorities</title>
<link>http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14765</link>
<description>N396 North Korea and U.S. Priorities
Etzioni, Amitai
</description>
<dc:date>2013-04-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14761">
<title>A451 Accomodating China</title>
<link>http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14761</link>
<description>A451 Accomodating China
Etzioni, Amitai
</description>
<dc:date>2013-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14760">
<title>N395 How Conservatives Still Run America, Despite Losing Elections</title>
<link>http://aladinrc.wrlc.org:80/handle/1961/14760</link>
<description>N395 How Conservatives Still Run America, Despite Losing Elections
Etzioni, Amitai
There is more than may appear in President Obama’s plan to cut the social safety net in his new budget proposal. The offer, on the face of it, reflects a significant violation of a major liberal creed, discarding the strongest liberal political card, and Obama’s peculiar negotiation style of making major concessions at the opening of a give-and-take session. But it also reflects the sad but true fact that the dynamics of American politics cannot be understood in terms of Democrats vs. Republicans. Party labels aside, the nation is still being ruled by what I call a majority “conservative party.”&#13;
&#13;
If Democrats and Republicans were the true divide, the meager gun control measures recently introduced in the Senate would have the majority needed to pass. After all, there are 53 Democratic Senators (and two independents who generally side with them). Moreover, this time, the threat of a GOP filibuster is not to blame. Yet the Democratic majority leader, Senator Harry Reid, removed the assault weapons ban from the draft bill, because some 15 Democratic senators, in effect, supported the conservative, pro-gun position, making up — with the Republican senators — that majority “conservative party.” Thanks to this party, the same legislative defeat is about to befall liberal proposals to curtail high-capacity magazines. This leaves only better background checks on the table, but these, too, will inevitably be rendered ineffective by the conservatives via the underhanded gutting of enforcement (more about this shortly).
</description>
<dc:date>2013-04-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
